One of the most important decisions we make for our dog, is which obedience training method to use.
This choice will affect the happiness and well-being of our dog, as well as shape our long-term relationship with our furry best friend.
Dog training is an area where emotions run hot, and we will hear many strong opinions or judgments from just about anyone and everyone.
The key to dog obedience training is not to be overly influenced by any one source. Gather information on a variety of methods, from a variety of sources, then judge which is the best one for you and your dog.
Some people may tell us that, “Obedience method X will never work for our dog, because he is too dominant, stubborn, fearful, or aggressive“.
Simplistic statements like these are never true. It is better to research the training method ourselves, and form our own opinion.
Basically, there are two classes of dog obedience training:
- Reward obedience training (give/remove something that our dog likes), and
- Aversive obedience training (give/remove something that our dog dislikes).
Reward Obedience Training
With reward obedience training, we first identify what our dog likes. Then, we encourage or discourage various behaviors by granting (positive reinforcement) or taking away (negative punishment) access to these rewards.
For example, when our dog sits, he gets a dog treat. If our dog is calm, he gets to interact with other dogs. We stop our dog from chewing on shoes, by redirecting him onto a Kong toy. Which rewards work best, depends on our dog’s personality and on his breed.
My Shiba Inu, for example, is a hunting breed and he is very motivated by chasing games. He also likes to explore new environments, and interact with other dogs. I will often use these as rewards while training him.
One common misconception is that we will not be an effective pack leader if we only use reward obedience training.
This is FALSE.
Pack leadership is most effectively achieved through the control of resources. We teach our dog that he gets the things that he wants most, such as food, toys, access to locations, and access to pack members, by following our lead.
Reward Obedience Training – The Good
1. Reward training helps to build a strong relationship based on trust.
Reward techniques teach a dog that all good things come from us. To get what he wants, he must first do what *we* want. Since we are viewed as a source for all of his needs, our dog will naturally gravitate toward us.
In addition, a dog learns that he has to work for his own keep. This engages him in interesting activities, helps him stay sharp, and helps to build confidence.
2. Reward training will not damage our dog either physically or mentally.
With reward training, the worst that happens is the removal of a reward. In contrast, physical aversive methods can cause damage to a dog, especially when not implemented properly.
Long term use of leash corrections may cause harm to our dog even when properly applied.
3. Reward training helps to create a dog that is happy and eager to work.
When we only use reward methods, our dog will be eager to work because work time means reward time.
Reward Obedience Training – The Bad
1. Reward training may not always solicit a prompt response to our commands.
For some dogs, a reward may not be as strong a motivator as an aversive stimulus, such as pain or fear.
2. . Reward training may sometimes require us to think outside the box.
With reward techniques, we may need to get creative and come up with our own strategies for motivating our dog. This is especially true when we are trying to stop bad behaviors because our dog may derive more enjoyment from the bad act.
3. Reward training may require that we bring along some treats or toys when on walks and outings.
This can be an inconvenience. However, we can also use the environment, and the objects around us as incentives. All it takes is a bit more imagination, and a bit more understanding of our dog.
4. Reward training may cause our dog to gain weight.
Obesity can sometimes become a problem if we give our dog too many treats. I easily avoid this by using my dog’s regular food rations as part of his training rewards.
Aversive Obedience Training
I divide aversive obedience training into three classes:
- Pain based (e.g. leash correction, muzzle slaps, ear pinch, shock collar);
- Dominance based (e.g. alpha rolls); and
- Other – which includes making loud noises (e.g. shaking or dropping a can of pennies, loud horn, clashing pots), using unpleasant smells (e.g. spraying bitter apple on furniture, spraying citronella on muzzle), using unpleasant sensations (spraying water on muzzle, dumping water on body) or anything else that our dog dislikes.
Different aversive methods may place more or less stress on our dog. In general, pain and dominance based methods are the most stressful.
With aversive obedience training, we encourage or discourage behaviors by applying (positive punishment) or stopping (negative reinforcement) an unpleasant stimulus.
For example, if our dog breaks from his stay before we release him, we give him a leash jerk. If our dog starts biting on the leash, we give him a leash jerk, or spray water on his muzzle until he stops. If he jumps, we give him a leash jerk or knee him.
Cesar Millan, one of the most popular dog trainers on television, uses mostly aversive obedience training. Millan has a lot of confidence, as well as a natural talent for reading dogs. This is very important when applying aversive techniques because if they are not implemented properly, they may cause physical and mental harm.
There are a variety of other trainers that use a combination of both reward and aversive techniques, such as The Monks of New Skete.
Aversive Obedience Training – The Good
1. Aversive training may get more consistent and prompt responses to commands.
Many dogs will perform a Sit, Down, or Stay, consistently and quickly because they do not wish to face the stress of an aversive stimulus. Once we get consistent and prompt responses from our dog, we can give him more freedom and let him participate in a wider range of activities.
2. Aversive training may show results in a shorter time-span.
As described above, dogs can be very motivated to avoid pain and threats. We will probably start to see results in a shorter period of time compared to reward training.
3. Do not need to carry around rewards such as treats or toys.
We always have what we need.
Aversive Obedience Training – The Bad
1. Aversive training may cause loss of trust.
One of the most dangerous aspects of aversive techniques is losing our dog’s trust. If we over-correct our dog, he may start to associate us with the painful aversive stimulus, and lose trust in us.
2. Aversive training may encourage aggression and other unwanted side effects.
If we do not implement an aversive method with the proper timing, force, and redirection, our dog may develop aggression toward us and other people. A recent University of Pennsylvania study shows that if we are aggressive to our dogs, they will be more likely to develop aggression issues.
3. Aversive training may injure our dog if not implemented correctly.
Incorrect implementation of some of these techniques may cause physical harm to our dog. It may also cause physical harm to us and others, when the dog responds to the aversive stimulus with aggression.
4. Aversive training may become ineffective once our dog gets habituated to the stimulus.
If we overuse an aversive method, it is very probable that our dog will become habituated to it (e.g. he becomes used to the pain). Once this occurs, the dog will be less motivated to respond to our commands because the pain or aversive stimulus is no longer a strong enough deterrent.
Dog Obedience Training
Carefully consider which techniques are most suited for you and your dog. Be flexible and do not be afraid to change approaches if the current methods are ineffective, or start to cause aggressive dog behavior.
There are four dog obedience training choices:
- Mostly aversive training with little praise and few treats (Cesar Millan).
- Only reward training (Suzanne Clothier, Patricia McConnell, Ian Dunbar, Victoria Stillwell).
- Mixture of aversive and reward training (Monks of New Skete);
- Only no-pain and no-dominance aversive methods, combined with reward training.
shibashake says
Thanks for dropping by ShepXgang.
“I wouldn’t recommend “pain aversion” for someone who doesn’t know what they’re doing. I’ve been training dogs for over 30 years now…”
That is very well said. Unfortunately, I think that is still the dominant method of dog training for most people – even new dog owners.
I also agree that the electronic collar can be useful in limited circumstances. As you say they are only appropriate for very intermittent short-term use, and only by someone who really knows what they are doing wrt. timing, force, and redirection.
Distance work and using them for rattlesnake aversion are the two circumstances that I can see them being of use. I am actually thinking of writing an article about electronic collars since they seem to be somewhat popular – which is unfortunate.
rchicaferro says
AND, reward training is more FUN then aversive training!
This helps me understand why I jump up and down when someone offers me a piece of pizza! Much more fun then getting hit on the nose with a rolled up newspaper!
shibashake says
Hi kblover,
“Nice to know I was on the right track with the multiple rewards š still learning this world of dog training”
Yeah – save the best reward for recalls, and only use it during recalls and nowhere else. If you have that, then the world is your oyster š
“If a tired dog is a good dog, a hungry Wally = an eager student!”
lol – I can just see Wally now, sitting in a perfect begging position, with his tongue hanging out, and looking just so š Gotta love them dogs!
kblover says
Nice to know I was on the right track with the multiple rewards š still learning this world of dog training.
I’m thankful Wally’s so food oriented. It’s hard enough keeping a step ahead of him sometimes and trying to make sure he’s making the right connections – last thing I need to do is try to come up with too many other rewards š
If a tired dog is a good dog, a hungry Wally = an eager student!
shibashake says
Hi kblover, I definitely agree with you. I am not a big fan of using physical corrections either. I started out with physical corrections, and it just made my dog more aggressive. My dog also started to lose trust in me. Now I only do reward obedience training.
You are also definitely right on with the different levels of reward. With some dogs though, it can be difficult to find a high priority enough reward to get them to comply. This is especially true for dogs that are not as food focused.
My Shiba is like that. So I just get more creative with him, and use things like cats, other dogs, balls he finds in the street š as his high priority rewards. It actually works out much better than physical corrections.
kblover says
I use a mixture of reward and no-reward training (Mix of reward and no-pain aversive poll option). I believe it lets me say both “yes” (reward) and “no” (no-reward) to the dog. I don’t like aversives that are directly physical and intimidating, especially with Wally – he’s already soft and very sensitive.
I think reward training can get around the “lagged response” if two rewards are used. The “fast response” reward is something really high value (favorite treat, piece of meat, etc) while a “plain” reward for a compliance but slower than you’d like?
shibashake says
Thanks Tom – You put a BIG smile on my face on this beautiful Sunday morning š
Tom Rubenoff says
Shibashake, I love the way you put a hub together. Such great information.
shibashake says
frogdropping – Is that why you got Kevin? š
rchicaferro – lol! I don’t know about that. It would depend on the newspaper. Surely it would be ok if it were the NYTimes! š
frogdropping says
Shiba – the idiot was was called Amber. Completely braindead š No joke!